Sabato, 06 Settembre 2025

Seguici su

"La libertà innanzi tutto e sopra tutto"
Benedetto Croce «Il Giornale d'Italia» (10 agosto 1943)

Is it legitimate to kill a head of state? Who is to say that Khamenei may be
assassinated but Benjamin Netanyahu may not?

From now on, it is permissible to assassinate heads of state. The only thing still up for debate is who is a legitimate target and who is not. Israelis are not

24 Giugno 2025

Is it legitimate to kill a head of state? Who is to say that Khamenei may beassassinated but Benjamin Netanyahu may not?

Is it legitimate to discuss assassinating the supreme leader of Iran,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei? Is it legitimate to kill a head of state, except in
the rarest of cases? If so, which head of state is a legitimate target and
which is not, and who decides? Who is to say that Khamenei may be
assassinated but Benjamin Netanyahu may not? That Vladimir Putin may
be killed, but not Donald Trump? Which of these poses a greater danger
to the world? It's all in the eye of the beholder.

Which scientists may be killed? Iranian nuclear scientists, yes, Israeli
nuclear scientists, no? On what basis? Both groups are scientists in the
service of the most monstrous industry of killing. This naturally leads to
the question of whether one country has the right to nuclear weapons
while another does not.

After all, the level of danger a country poses can change. Iran was not
always a dangerous country, and Israel will not always be an
undangerous country. There are already plenty of crazy politicians in
Israel who pose a risk to the entire region. Would it be legitimate to
entrust them with the secret code? Would it be legitimate to assassinate
them?

These questions are exceedingly charged; Israel avoids discussing them
and fudges the answers, citing the sacred argument: "How can you even
compare?" Israel cannot be compared to any entity in the world. Yigal
Amir, who assassinated former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1995,
believed that Rabin posed an existential threat to the state of Israel.
There aren't many Israelis who think this gave Amir license to murder
the prime minister.

Now Israel thinks Khamenei is an existential threat, and therefore it is
permitted to murder him: "Murder" is the correct word here, the most
precise. If we set aside the assumption that Israel invented for itself,  according to which it is permitted to do what is prohibited to the rest of
the world, it is very difficult to address these questions. The claim that
Israel is a special case, because to us all is permitted, because we are
survivors of the Holocaust and of the October 7 massacre, does not hold
water. The world is also beginning to tire of it. The answer to these
questions must be universal.

Israel invokes a comparison between Khamenei and Hitler to justify the
impending assassination. It is clear that Hitler had to be eliminated, but
Khamenei is not Hitler. Israel claims it refrains from harming civilians.
Khamenei is a civilian, not the chief of staff or a general. We can also set
aside momentarily the issue of legitimacy and ask whether it is wise to
kill him.

The war in Iran is on the verge of becoming complicated. Yaniv Kubovich
reported that Israeli military officials are suddenly saying that Israel
cannot be subject to a timeframe. This is how one begins to sink into the
swamp. Assassinating Khamenei would only make things worse.
Meanwhile, the defense minister is playing God. In this capacity, Israel
Katz announced that Khamenei cannot be allowed to "continue to exist."

What are Katz's criteria for being allowed "to exist"? He decides who
shall live and who shall die? A heavenly court led by a laughable Israeli
cabinet member? Is Iran's defense minister allowed to threaten his
Israeli counterpart with murder?

The talking heads in Israeli news studios speak about the "scientists'
hunt" in Iran, perhaps an allusion to the Mossad's hunting of German
scientists in Egypt in the 1960s. Terminology does matter, and it is as vile
as the defense minister's breath. One does not "hunt" scientists, because
they are not animals (the hunting of which is also horrific), even if they
are Iranian.

Calls for the assassination of heads of state are not legitimate from any
party. Our Netanyahu is now responsible for the killing of tens of
thousands in Gaza. Is it permissible to call for his assassination in order
to save the remnants of the nation there? Many Israelis also think he is a
tyrant, that he is destroying the country and ruining Israeli democracy,
that he is the most despicable Jew in history and a host of other insults
yet no one, it must be hoped, even imagines discussing his assassination.
The discussion about eliminating Khamenei opens the door to legitimacy:
From now on, it is permissible to assassinate heads of state. The only
thing still up for debate is who is a legitimate target and who is not.
Israelis are not.

Gideon Levy

Source: Haaretz

Il Giornale d'Italia è anche su Whatsapp. Clicca qui per iscriversi al canale e rimanere sempre aggiornati.

Commenti Scrivi e lascia un commento

Condividi le tue opinioni su Il Giornale d'Italia

Caratteri rimanenti: 400

Articoli Recenti

x